Grief and loss
Dispelling 5 common myths about grief
By Dr. Alan D. Wolfelt. Dr. Alan D. Wolfelt is a noted
author, educator and practicing grief counselor.
This article appears with permission from The
Support Network of Edmonton. The Support Network's Suicide Bereavement
Program offers individual, family, and group support to those grieving
a loss to suicide.
Identifying the myths
- Grief and mourning are the same experience.
- There is a predictable and orderly stage-like progression
to the experience of mourning.
- It is best to move away from grief, instead of toward it.
- Following the death of someone significant to you, the goal
is to "get over" your grief.
- Years expressing grief are only a sign of weakness.
Myth # 1:
Grief and mourning are the same experience.
The majority of people tend to use the words grief and mourning
synonymously. However, there is an important distinction between
them. We have learned that people move toward healing not by just
grieving, but through mourning.
If we want to help the bereaved, we can work to understand
the semantic distinctions of these commonly used terms. Simply
stated, grief is a term for the thoughts and feelings that are
experienced within oneself upon the death of someone loved. In
other words, grief is the internal meaning given to the experience
of bereavement.
Mourning is taking the internal experience of grief and
expressing it outside of oneself. The specific ways in which
people express mourning are influenced by the customs of their
culture. Another way of defining mourning is to state that it
is "grief gone public" or "sharing one's grief outside of oneself."
In reality, many people in our culture grieve, but they do
not mourn. As opposed to being encouraged to express their grief
outwardly, they are often greeted with messages along the lines of
"carry on," "keep your chin up," and Keep busy". So, they end
up grieving within themselves, in isolation, instead of mourning
outside of themselves in the presence of loving companions.
Now that these terms have been defined in a more formal
sense, let's take a moment to acknowledge that grief and
mourning are much more than these words describe. Actually,
I find words inadequate to convey what grief and morning are
all about.
"Grief" and "mourning" are much more than words.
Experiencing the thoughts and feelings of grief often involves
movement through an unknown territory, accompanied by an
overwhelming sense of pain and loss. Only through encouraging
ourselves and others to mourn outside of ourselves will we become
a catalyst for healing.
Don't just grieve: mourn, too, and be proud of your
capacity to do so!
Myths # 2:
There is a predictable and orderly stage-like progression to the experience
of mourning.
Stage-like thinking about both dying and mourning has been
appealing to many people. Somehow the "stages of grief" have
helped people try to make sense out of an experience that isn't
so orderly and predictable as we would like it to be.
Attempts have been made to replace fear and lack of
understanding with the security that everyone grieves by going
through the same stages. If only it were so simple!
The concept of "stages" was popularized in 1969 with the
publication of Elisabeth Kubler-Ross's landmark text On Death and Dying
. Kubler-Ross never intended for people to literally
interpret her "five stages of dying". However, many people have
done just that, and the consequences have often been disastrous.
One such consequences is that people around the grieving
person adopt a rigid system of beliefs about grief that does not
allow for the natural unfolding of the mourner's personal experience.
We have come to understand that each person's grief is uniquely his
or her own. As helpers, we only get ourselves in trouble when we
try to prescribe what someone's grief experience should be.
Just as different people die in different ways, people mourn
in different ways. Expecting anything less would be to demonstrate
a lack of respect for the uniqueness of the person. I prefer a
helping attitude that conveys the following: "teach me about your
grief and I will be with you. As you teach me I will follow your
lead, and attempt to be a stabilizing and empathetic presence."
To think that one's goal as a caregiver is to move people
through the stages of grief would be a misuse of the helping
role. A variety of unique thoughts and feelings will be experienced
as part of the healing process. For example, disorganization, fear,
guilt, and anger may or may not occur. Often, regression occurs
along the way and, invariably, some overlapping. Sometimes emotions
succeed one another within a short period of time; at other times,
two or more emotions are present in the grieving person simultaneously.
Do not prescribe how someone should grieve, but allow them to
teach you where they are in their process.
Myth # 3:
It is best to move away from grief instead of toward it.
The unfortunate reality is that many grievers do not give
themselves permission or receive permission from others mourn,
to express their many thoughts and feelings. We continue to live
in a society that often encourages people to prematurely move away
from their grief instead of toward it. The result is that many
people either grieve in isolation or attempt to run away from their
grief through various means.
During ancient times, stoic philosophers encouraged their
followers not to mourn, believing that self-control was the
appropriated response to sorrow. Still, today, well-intentioned
but uninformed people carry on this long-held tradition. A vital
task of the helper is to encourage and support the movement toward
an outward expression of grief.
One of the reasons for many people's preoccupation with the
very question "how long does grief last", is often related to
society's impatience with grief, and the desire to move people
away from the experience of mourning. Shortly after the funeral
(if a funeral is held) the grieving person is expected to be
back to normal.
Persons who continue to express their grief outwardly are
often viewed as "weak", "crazy", or "self-pitying". The common
message is "shape up and get on with your life". The reality is
that many people view grief as something to be overcome rather
than experienced.
The result of these kinds of messages is to encourage the
repression of the griever's thoughts and feelings. Refusing to
allow tears, suffering in silence, and "being strong: are thought
to be admirable behaviours. Many people in grief have internalized
society's message that mourning should be done quietly, quickly,
and efficiently.
Returning to the routine of work shortly after the death of
someone loved, the bereaved person relates, "I'm fine", in essence
saying, "I'm not mourning." Friends, family and co-workers of
then encourage this stance, and refrain from talking about the
death. The bereaved person, showing an apparent absence of mourning
(having moved away from their grief instead of toward it), tends to
be more socially accepted by those around him or her.
However, this type of collaborative pretense does not meet the
emotional needs of the bereaved person. Instead, the survivor is
likely to feel further isolated in the experience of grief, with
the eventual onset of the "going crazy syndrome". Attempting to
mask or move away from the grief results in internal anxiety and
confusion. With little, if any, social recognition related to the
pain of the grief, the person often begins to think their thoughts
and feelings are abnormal. As a matter of fact, the most frequent
initial comment of grieving persons at our Center for Loss and Life
Transition in Colorado is the statement, "I think I'm going crazy".
Our society encourages people to prematurely move away from
their grief instead of toward it. If we wan to help bereaved
people, we must remember that it is through the process of moving
toward pain that we move toward eventually healing.
Myth # 4:
Following the death of someone significant to you, the goal is to "get
over" your grief.
We have all had the unfortunate experience of hearing people
inquire of the bereaved person, "are you over it yet?" Or worse
yet we hear people comment, "Well, they should be over it by now."
To think that we as human beings "get over" our grief is ludicrous!
The final dimension of grief in a number of proposed model
is often referred to as resolution, recovery, reestablishment, or
reorganization. This dimension often suggests a total return to
"normalcy", and yet, in my personal and professional experience,
everyone is changed by the experience of grief.
For the mourner to assume that life will be exactly as it
was prior to the death is unrealistic and potentially damaging.
Recovery, as understood by some people, mourners and caregivers
alike, is all too often seen erroneously as an absolute, perfect
state of reestablishment.
Reconciliation is a term I believe to be more expressive of what occurs
as the person works to integrate the new reality of moving
forward in life without the physical presence of the person
who has died. What occurs is a renewed sense of energy and
confidence, an ability to fully acknowledge the reality of
the death, and the capacity to become reinvolved with the
activities of living. Also, an acknowledgment occurs that
pain and grief are difficult, yet necessary parts of life
and living.
As the experience of reconciliation unfolds, the mourner
recognizes that life will be different without the presence of
the significant person who has died. A realization occurs that
reconciliation's a process, not an event. Beyond an intellectual
working knowledge is an emotional working through. What has been
understood at the "head" level is now understood as the "heart"
level—the person who was loved is dead.
The pain changes form being ever-present, sharp, and stinging
to an acknowledge feeling of loss that has given rise to renewed
meaning and purpose. The sense of loss does not completely
disappear, but softens, and the intense pangs of grief become
less frequent. Hope for a continued life emerges, as the griever
is able to make commitments to the future, realizing that the dead
person will never be forgotten. Yet knowing that one's own life
can and will move forward.
We never "get over" our grief but instead become reconciled to
it. Those people who think the goal it to "resolve" grief become
destructive to the healing process.
Myth # 5:
Tears expressing grief are only a sign of weakness.
Unfortunately, many people associate tears of grief with
personal inadequacy and weakness. The mourner's tears often
generate feelings of helplessness in friends, family, and caregivers.
Out of a wish to protect the mourners from pain, those
people surrounding the mourner may serve to inhibit the experience
of tears. Comments similar to, "tears won't bring him back" and
"he wouldn't want you to cry" discourage the expression of tears.
Yet crying is nature's way of releasing internal tension in the body,
and allows the mourner to communicate a need to be comforted.
Another function of crying is postulated in the context of
"attachment theory", wherein tears are intended to bring about
reunion with the lost person. While the reunion cannot occur,
crying is though to be biologically based, and a normal way of
attempting to reconnect with the person who has died. The frequency
and intensity of crying eventually wane as the hoped-for reunion
does not occur.
While research in this area is still limited, some investigators
have suggested that suppressing tears may increase susceptibility to
stress-related disorders. This would seem to make sense in that crying
is an excretory process. Others such processes, such as sweating and
exhaling, involve the removal of waste product from the body; crying
may serve a similar function.
In my clinical experience with thousands of people in grief, I
have observed changes in physical expression following the expression
of tears. While this is purely a subjective observation, seemingly not
only do people feel better after crying, they also look better. The
capacity to express tears appears to allow for a genuine healing.
Crying is not a sign of weakness. The capacity of the mourner
to share tears is an indication of the willingness to do the work
of mourning.
Final thoughts
Again, be aware that the above myths are not intended to be
all-inclusive. I suggest you develop a list of any additional "grief
myths" observed in our society.
Being surrounded by people who believe in these myths invariably
results in a heightened sense of isolation and aloneness in the grieving
person. The inability to be supported in the work of mourning destroys
much of their capacity to enjoy living and loving.
Only when we as a society are able to dispel these myths will
grieving people experience the healing they deserve.